Re:We launched an app with $500k annual revenue, and then Ap...
by megous on Monday June 17, 2019 @06:00PM
(#20207804)
Sorry, I don't see it. If some app blocks access to other apps, when you don't want it, you simlpy uninstall it.
Re:We launched an app with $500k annual revenue, and then Ap...
by panopticon on Monday June 17, 2019 @07:51PM
(#20208468)
If that answer was adequate, Apple wouldn't have to audit apps to ensure they're not abusing the contacts permission.
The potential for abuse and erosion of user trust seems orders of magnitude larger than the apps we are missing out on by not having such an API.
Re:We launched an app with $500k annual revenue, and then Ap...
by megous on Monday June 17, 2019 @08:33PM
(#20208741)
I was writing specifically about (potential) app blocking API.
I'm not sure what user trust you're talking about, though. Apple allowed shady VPN tracking/blocking apps in the past and users used them.
Re:We launched an app with $500k annual revenue, and then Ap...
by panopticon on Monday June 17, 2019 @10:17PM
(#20209256)
I was responding generally about either API; my thoughts are similar.
My position is one of a cost/benefit ratio. VPNs have a lot of good use cases (enterprise networking, privacy from shady networks, etc) that outweigh the potential for harm.
Good use cases for apps exercising control over others are screen time monitors and parental controls? Maybe I’m being unimaginative, but that’s a narrow band of functionality better served by OS-level features.
Even if Apple did provide such an API, the app in question also blocked access to social media apps via the VPN. My head would explode if Apple allowed apps to exercise direct control over others apps in such a fashion.