Re:Word processors are ditching equation editors in favour o...
by tapia on Sunday June 16, 2019 @01:26AM
(#20193985)
It is not about the table, but the placing of the table. If you want a table that spans both columns in a double column document, it is annoying to do it in word, while in LaTeX it is as easy as \begin{table*}. Creating a content of a table is something different, and there are multiple approaches. I normally need result from python scripts, so I just export my results to latex format with pandas.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Word processors are ditching equation editors in favour o...
by patrick5415 on Sunday June 16, 2019 @01:42PM
(#20196793)
The ability to have your simulation code automatically update the data and figures in the manuscript is hugely valuable.
Another neat trick is a latex package called Catchfilebetweentags. This let’s you have a text file with named data fields that you can insert into your document, like when you want to state a parameter that was used in a paragraph. Generating that text file as an artifact of the rest of the data processing means, e.g., that parameters my paper says I used are the ones that I actually used.
Re:Word processors are ditching equation editors in favour o...
by godelski on Sunday June 16, 2019 @04:11AM
(#20194432)
Use minipages. I completely understand where you're coming from. But once I started using minipages I found that it is a great way to hack around almost all of these weird and uncommon placement issues.
Re:Word processors are ditching equation editors in favour o...
by BeetleB on Sunday June 16, 2019 @02:26PM
(#20197066)
>so I just export my results to latex format with pandas.
In other words, you don't do it by hand. I too rely on a tool to create my tables, which was my point. Doing it by hand is painful.