News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Word processors are ditching equation editors in favour o... by forrestthewoods on Saturday June 15, 2019 @11:11PM (#20193623)
I utterly despise the layout of academic papers. They’re garbage. Two column layouts have no place in the digital age.

Academic papers should have rich media. High resolution images and video.

Bah hum bug!

Re:Word processors are ditching equation editors in favour o... by garmaine on Sunday June 16, 2019 @12:03AM (#20193780)
Strange, I find the compressed width of two columns perfect for mobile phones.
Re:Word processors are ditching equation editors in favour o... by forrestthewoods on Sunday June 16, 2019 @01:34PM (#20196750)
Really?

I find myself scrolling down then up, down then up. I also have to manually control the zoom so text fills my screen width. Then I had to scroll left and right. And when I want to scroll vertically I have to be careful to not screw up my horizontal position. It’s super frustrating.

I don’t think a single blog in the world uses a two column view. If it were an actually useful format for sharing information digitally then it would be more prevalent.

Re:Word processors are ditching equation editors in favour o... by zapzupnz on Sunday June 16, 2019 @11:46PM (#20199731)
> I don't think a single blog in the world…

Well, yeah, you don't typically print blogs. Remember that academic publications are still printed, and columnar presentation can be very useful for annotation.

Re:Word processors are ditching equation editors in favour o... by garmaine on Sunday June 16, 2019 @02:24PM (#20197055)
Double tap the text column and it auto-fits. When you reach the end give it a big ol’ swipe from the opposite corner and it will pull the other column into view.

At least in iOS...

Re:Word processors are ditching equation editors in favour o... by godelski on Sunday June 16, 2019 @03:59AM (#20194395)
I also find it easier to read on physical paper. Honestly I read faster when things are two column (speed readers will tell you why)