Re:Word processors are ditching equation editors in favour o...
by nradov on Saturday June 15, 2019 @10:40PM
(#20193525)
In MS Word, an inadvertent click won't change an image size. You have to click and drag. And inserting a figure certainly doesn't screw up table numbering.
Re:Word processors are ditching equation editors in favour o...
by marcosdumay on Saturday June 15, 2019 @11:28PM
(#20193685)
> You have to click and drag.
Or type a letter, or open the document on a different computer, or set margins, paragraph size, printer, whatever.
But yes, just clicking an image won't change it.
Re:Word processors are ditching equation editors in favour o...
by joppy on Sunday June 16, 2019 @10:46AM
(#20195704)
Just because this is the way that most word processors currently work, does not mean it needs to be this way. You could imagine a word processor where the default mode was to edit content only, and editing structure/layout was hidden behind a second button or something.
Re:Word processors are ditching equation editors in favour o...
by copperx on Tuesday June 18, 2019 @02:54PM
(#20216940)
LyX is, for me, the perfect word processor. It doesn't have those flaws. The only reason I use Word instead is because it makes collaboration and sharing with colleagues extremely simple.
In a word processor, an image size can be changed by inadvertently clicking on something, the style of a text selection can be changed by moving the mouse scroll wheel on the font drop-down menu, page numbering may not refresh when working on a large document, inserting a figure may screw up table or image numbering, etc. You have to be constantly checking your multi page document to make sure everything is still ok.
As a teacher, my heuristic is simple: if I'm authoring a document that is less than 3 pages, I use Word. Otherwise, I use LaTeX.
For example, I write exams and syllabi in LaTeX. Quizzes, assignments and handouts in Word. It has worked well for me for a decade.