If you feel the need to punch someone in the face for saying that abortion or illegal immigration is wrong, you need to take a serious look at your mental state, and not try to pretend in some abstract way that they are threatening your wellbeing in order to justify your violence.

I never said that, in fact I posted the opposite in the post you just replied to, where I demonstrated that some speech does have legitimate physical consequences. Your consistent misrepresentation of the posts in this thread make me think you are either trolling, arguing in bad faith, or genuinely don't understand what is being discussed.

The law is not the same as public consensus, and it does not have the same guidelines/requirements.

I don't support punching nazis, but that is not the same as deplatforming them

The rights are in fact more expansive than the laws which protect them. Hence just because something is legal does not mean it is not a violation of rights.

Many cases of 'deplatforming' are in fact a violation of the right to free speech. If a group of megacorps which own the systems we use to enact discourse and make a living decides to do everything to prevent you from using those systems, they are violating your rights.

Zero speech should be met with vigilante violence. Speech which is direct incitement should be reported to law enforcement.