News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on Gimp 2.10.12. Parent comment

Re:Gimp 2.10.12 by prokoudine on Friday June 14, 2019 @10:44AM (#20183397)
You are looking at the wrong number :) That's the total amount of forks on GitHub. Whereas only 15 of them had any commits by people who forked the repository. Among those 15 people:

- One is a regular GIMP contributor.

- One couldn't wait another day for a macOS build of version 2.10.12.

- One patched file association on Windows and submitted his patch to the upstream project.

- Some of the others worked on their pet peeves, and some of them discussed it on the upstream bug tracker.

You might want revisiting your definition of a fork :)

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Gimp 2.10.12 by defective on Friday June 14, 2019 @11:42AM (#20183881)
Sure. I'll agree with your definition then!

*Ah, what the fork! I just realized you're a GIMPer. You think that thing I said about the 1998 drama is what inferiorhuman was referencing?

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Gimp 2.10.12 by prokoudine on Friday June 14, 2019 @05:18PM (#20186747)
Yeah, I thought you did just that. Wouldn't be the first time I'm wrong, of course.
[ Parent | on HN ]