News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Show HN: Parse no-protocol URL, no-domain URI and email a... by prashnts on Friday June 14, 2019 @06:37AM (#20181879)
I’m just wondering if it can parse things like « pls-no-spam at google’s email service », which a human can easily parse to [email protected]. I suppose POS tagging with some heuristics can get it working for a few cases.

And if it can, I feel the most users for this would be email harvesting spam bots. Which would not be super nice. Although in ideal and less common scenarios it could actually be useful for IR purposes.

Re:Show HN: Parse no-protocol URL, no-domain URI and email a... by albertgoeswoof on Friday June 14, 2019 @06:47AM (#20181914)
Not sure why people bother to use the << spam at google's email >> approach when they can use an email forwarding service that lets you turn email addresses off, like https://idbloc.co (disclaimer, I built this)
Re:Show HN: Parse no-protocol URL, no-domain URI and email a... by omegabravo on Friday June 14, 2019 @07:03AM (#20181973)
I think these are a great idea. The reason that people use that method is because it is free, and the suggested alternative costs money.

I typically use throw away email addresses instead since they're free. If I actually want to use the service/account some day I'll sign up properly.

I expect someday the primary email providers will generate aliases on demand.

Re:Show HN: Parse no-protocol URL, no-domain URI and email a... by myu701 on Friday June 14, 2019 @10:18AM (#20183203)
Fastmail lets you convert [email protected] to [email protected]

It's not a literal alias, but it works out fine.

One of these days I'm going to propose the Thunderbird + K-9 mail addons that say 'set the sent from email address to be equal to the sent to email address', that way if [email protected] is the recipient, it will be the sender to any replies, rather than the MUA default replying with [email protected] (but that's a separate discussion)

Re:Show HN: Parse no-protocol URL, no-domain URI and email a... by asdkhadsj on Friday June 14, 2019 @03:22PM (#20185898)
I didn't know that was possible, really neat!
Re:Show HN: Parse no-protocol URL, no-domain URI and email a... by giancarlostoro on Friday June 14, 2019 @07:45AM (#20182167)
> I typically use throw away email addresses instead since they're free. If I actually want to use the service/account some day I'll sign up properly.

The example above is about giving a direct line to be contacted through email on a personal site or blog, heck even a professional one.

> I expect someday the primary email providers will generate aliases on demand.

I know at least ProtonMail does it. But also theres the email#[email protected] trick that works nicely enough.

Re:Show HN: Parse no-protocol URL, no-domain URI and email a... by prashnts on Friday June 14, 2019 @07:55AM (#20182212)
That example is quite common within academic context: most of the researchers and professors I know, who have a university homepage, use this.

I guess its because they do want legitimate people to reach them easily (students, collaborators etc) and if spams do go through — well they'd probably ignore it, just like they ignore other emails.

Re:Show HN: Parse no-protocol URL, no-domain URI and email a... by sametmax on Friday June 14, 2019 @06:55AM (#20181949)
Because I don't want to shutdown the address later: people may try to use it to reach me.

I use anti spam addresses to register to new services.

Re:Show HN: Parse no-protocol URL, no-domain URI and email a... by perseaalexandra on Friday June 14, 2019 @06:57AM (#20181960)
Not sure why people bother using idbloc.co instead of burnermail.io
Re:Show HN: Parse no-protocol URL, no-domain URI and email a... by OJFord on Friday June 14, 2019 @06:46AM (#20181909)
Sanitising user input seems a good use-case too - I'd like it built in to my email client, for example.

(More likely to be useful than Outlook's typically wildly incorrect guesses at when someone's suggesting a meeting/calendar event!)