News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Woman With No Fear Intrigues Scientists by JanezStupar on Friday December 17, 2010 @05:35PM (#2018158)
I apologize, but to me you came over like you haven't seen a nice one before :).

I might do the same in your shoes. But the fact remains that pitbull is no more dangerous inherently than your average mutt. Probably less so. Yes when they go wrong they tend to cause a bigger mess - but so does Porsche or Ferrari. But we don't go around banning the dangerous car.

Re:Woman With No Fear Intrigues Scientists by kenjackson on Friday December 17, 2010 @05:48PM (#2018204)
Well causing a bigger mess is kind of a big deal. If a toy poodle attacks me I can likely win. Against a pitbull, I don't like my odds.

And there are a LOT more pitbull fatalaties than your average mutt. See http://www.dogsbite.org/bite-fatalities-2010.htm

Re:Woman With No Fear Intrigues Scientists by JanezStupar on Sunday December 19, 2010 @04:59AM (#2021455)
I can see now what I did there, I'm not a native speaker so formulating complex ideas is still pretty hard for me in english.

It was wrong of me to say that Pits are less dangerous than your average mutt - because that is clearly not the case, since your average mutt is NOT 100 LBS of muscle and determination.

I should of said that pits are (inherently) less likely to attack humans than your average mutt - meaning they take "encouragement" (read training) towards human agression.

Re:Woman With No Fear Intrigues Scientists by jules on Friday December 17, 2010 @06:01PM (#2018237)
Have any evidence beyond hunches to back up this theory?