Re:Court: Photographer has no recourse against university co...
by icebraining on Friday June 14, 2019 @03:07AM
(#20181059)
The problem isn't the judge; it's that the defendant didn't claim copyright infringement, but a "taking" of property. I'd rather like to know who is the lawyer.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Court: Photographer has no recourse against university co...
by caf on Friday June 14, 2019 @03:29AM
(#20181116)
If you read the link posted elsewhere in the thread by Mathnerd314, it is apparent that the question of whether the states can be sued for copyright infringement is a live one, on which the Supreme Court has just granted certiorari.
Re:Court: Photographer has no recourse against university co...
by icebraining on Friday June 14, 2019 @05:48AM
(#20181679)
Thanks; I was led astray by another case (Cambridge University Press v. Patton) in which a State University was found guilty, but it seems they simply failed to raise the immunity argument and therefore the court didn't apply it.