Ask HN: Why is Couchbase Server under-represented here?

Re:Ask HN: Why is Couchbase Server under-represented here? by prashere on Thursday June 13, 2019 @06:31AM (#20173361)

I have built applications that uses couchbase both on server side and couchbase-lite on Android. Couchbase with the ability to sync between client and server replication is the best thing to happen and available free (community edition) today.

Unfortunately couchbase-server consumes lot of resource on the backend and it's heavy, which brings an entry of barrier from a start up point of view.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Ask HN: Why is Couchbase Server under-represented here? by isoos on Thursday June 13, 2019 @09:19AM (#20174532)

Do you have some numbers about the resource usage that you can share? 4GB minimum memory (16G recommended) is necessarily a heavy requirement given the wide variety of things the server does. CockroachDB may be similar to this, and my servers consume between 1-2GB memory usually.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Ask HN: Why is Couchbase Server under-represented here? by newsoul2019 on Friday June 14, 2019 @05:49PM (#20186942)

This is true. Generally, you need at least 3 nodes for the smallest Couchbase cluster. At least that was true a couple of years ago.

[ Parent | on HN ]