Re:We Have Four Years to Save Ourselves from Climate Change,...
by stubish on Wednesday June 12, 2019 @10:02AM
(#20164712)
Could, not would. Like smoking can kill you, not smoking will kill you. It is a common and fundamental English language pattern, clearly indicating doubt and should never be misinterpreted as certainty.
Re:We Have Four Years to Save Ourselves from Climate Change,...
by WillPostForFood on Wednesday June 12, 2019 @12:15PM
(#20166220)
Fair enough, but could is enough to play on people's fears. Immigrant X could be a terrorist. Food additive Y could cause cancer. You can't then claim you didn't say "would".
Note that things like tobacco cancer warnings use use can/could not will/would, and the intent of the message is still clear.
"SURGEON GENERAL WARNING: Cigar Smoking Can Cause Lung Cancer And Heart Disease."
"WARNING: This product can cause mouth cancer."
https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/ice-caps-melt-gore-2014/
e.g. in 2007:
Their latest modelling studies indicate northern polar waters could be ice-free in summers within just 5-6 years. Professor Wieslaw Maslowski told an American Geophysical Union meeting that previous projections had underestimated the processes now driving ice loss.