News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:IPFS, Again by rohan1024 on Wednesday June 12, 2019 @08:39AM (#20163910)
It's not the cost that's preventing what you mentioned. It's the ISPs which don't allow incoming traffic and have symmetric NATs all over there network. IPV6 is here and we should have gotten rid of NAT long ago but there's no incentive for corporations or ISPs so we are stuck here.
Re:IPFS, Again by beders on Wednesday June 12, 2019 @08:52AM (#20164007)
That's true as well. ISPs have no interest allowing end users to host anything meaningful.
Re:IPFS, Again by ronsor on Wednesday June 12, 2019 @12:43PM (#20166569)
well it's against the terms of service (though if you have no other ISP options, it's more like terms of slavery)