Re:States are looking to jam T-Mobile and Sprint’s proposed ...
by rhino369 on Tuesday June 11, 2019 @11:46PM
(#20161617)
If we did that 30 years ago, we’d have really affordable GPRS systems. We can’t even upgrade bridges and dams.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:States are looking to jam T-Mobile and Sprint’s proposed ...
by mateo- on Wednesday June 12, 2019 @12:33AM
(#20161796)
do...do we want GPRS?
Re:States are looking to jam T-Mobile and Sprint’s proposed ...
by jaredklewis on Wednesday June 12, 2019 @12:58AM
(#20161890)
That's the parent's point. If the government owned the wireless infrastructure, that infrastructure would be in the same state as our dams and bridges (i.e. not good).
Re:States are looking to jam T-Mobile and Sprint’s proposed ...
by baroffoos on Wednesday June 12, 2019 @01:17AM
(#20161965)
Obviously your government has to not be a disaster before this will work.
Re:States are looking to jam T-Mobile and Sprint’s proposed ...
by rayiner on Wednesday June 12, 2019 @09:14AM
(#20164182)
Fun fact: Maryland's transit agency recently moved to diesel technology for its next generation of commuter train locomotives. The railroads in this area were first electrified more than a century ago, and most of the last several generations of locomotives were electric. But the overhead catenary is in bad shape, and some lines have stops that haven't been electrified. Maryland apparently believes that, over the 20-30 year service life of these locomotives, the infrastructure is likely to deteriorate further (to 19th century levels), instead of improve, such that diesel is the smarter option.