Re:GrapheneOS – A privacy and security-focused mobile OS wit...
by beenBoutIT on Tuesday June 11, 2019 @12:35AM
(#20153040)
If you're willing to make your location known in order to take advantage of location services why wouldn't you want the very best possible service? There are complicated workarounds that can be used in place of Google's location services but none of them are anywhere near as easy to implement for the app developer or as easy to use or as accurate for the end user.
Re:GrapheneOS – A privacy and security-focused mobile OS wit...
by ocdtrekkie on Tuesday June 11, 2019 @01:24AM
(#20153180)
GPS doesn't make your location known at all, it's receiving only. It sends information about your location to nobody, it triangulates your position from publicly broadcast signals.
And, I would much rather "make my location known" to about fifty other companies before I would want Google to have it.
Re:GrapheneOS – A privacy and security-focused mobile OS wit...
by jammygit on Tuesday June 11, 2019 @03:05AM
(#20153492)
I did not know that and even looked it up to confirm. Thanks for mentioning it
https://www.maptoaster.com/maptoaster-topo-nz/articles/how-g...
Re:GrapheneOS – A privacy and security-focused mobile OS wit...
by ocdtrekkie on Tuesday June 11, 2019 @03:14PM
(#20158566)
Yeah, GPS is actually insanely cool technology, and the US making it available to everyone was a real public service. Now of course, other nations are, partially for defense purposes of course, deploying similar networks as well.
And it's just out there. Usable with no subscription, no account, nothing. It's just free data.
Re:GrapheneOS – A privacy and security-focused mobile OS wit...
by beenBoutIT on Wednesday June 12, 2019 @03:34PM
(#20168420)
Notice I didn't specifically mention GPS, although I agree that it is pretty cool. That said, GPS alone isn't capable of providing the UX that end users expect from a modern app. Fused Location is required for more accurate location information and it isn't passive like GPS.
Microsoft's apps are specifically an example I've given of how closed Android truly is: Even Google's competitors, which have all of the same service capabilities, are essentially forced to use Google Play Services. Especially when you consider the other top HN item today about how Google now essentially requires all apps use a closed source Firebase library for push notifications.
And while yes, Google Location Services is a location provider that slots into Android, you are missing that Google has convinced app developers to call it directly, rather than using the Android location provider. This means that no alternate location provider will do: Google Location Services is hard coded into almost every location-based Android app today.