News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Google's Captcha in Firefox vs. in Chrome by novaleaf on Monday June 10, 2019 @12:16PM (#20148099)
if this is true, I'd love to hear the alternate! I use recaptcha and hate that my chinese customers need to do wacky stuff to circumvent it.
Re:Google's Captcha in Firefox vs. in Chrome by shawnz on Monday June 10, 2019 @12:35PM (#20148273)
See: https://developers.google.com/recaptcha/docs/faq

Look under the section "use recaptcha globally" -- this is what I was referring to. However it's not clear to me if this approach enables use in China or not.

Re:Google's Captcha in Firefox vs. in Chrome by Theodores on Monday June 10, 2019 @12:48PM (#20148401)
Thanks for that. Changing to www.recaptcha.net right now!

Could be a while before I get enquiries from China but there is only one way to find out.

Google did say 'globally'...

Re:Google's Captcha in Firefox vs. in Chrome by vinay_ys on Monday June 10, 2019 @12:24PM (#20148171)
Just out of curiosity, why do you use reCaptcha?
Re:Google's Captcha in Firefox vs. in Chrome by judge2020 on Monday June 10, 2019 @12:26PM (#20148185)
Not sure if this is "officially" supported but I believe you can proxy the `api.js` file yourself without issue.
Re:Google's Captcha in Firefox vs. in Chrome by fasthandle on Monday June 10, 2019 @12:42PM (#20148347)
The photos or voice still needs to come from from somewhere. The somewhere is google.com. The .com is blocked.
Re:Google's Captcha in Firefox vs. in Chrome by shawnz on Monday June 10, 2019 @12:47PM (#20148392)
Please see my other reply in this thread: "recaptcha.net" can also be used. Is that blocked in China too? I can't find a clear answer.
Re:Google's Captcha in Firefox vs. in Chrome by fasthandle on Monday June 10, 2019 @01:07PM (#20148604)
I pinged recapture.net and got a 50ms response time. Baidu would give a 20ms response time. That's on WiFi. That leads me to think the server responding to these pings is in certainly in mainland China, I think in Alibaba's IP range, but probably not a CDN. Interesting, thanks.