News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Apple Is Listening by Alupis on Monday June 10, 2019 @03:50AM (#20144678)
Wouldn't someone like you be better served on a 32 or 64 core Threadripper workstation then?

I assume there's I/O bottlenecking in there somewhere, but for the rest, surely you're not 100% pegging all 16 cores all the time, but more parallelism would still benefit you to a certain extent... While not costing $6k+ for a base 8 core machine.

Re:Apple Is Listening by viraptor on Monday June 10, 2019 @04:35AM (#20144887)
Or even have a dedicated build server/farm with object caching. At some point building on your own machine is not a great solution.
Re:Apple Is Listening by vbezhenar on Monday June 10, 2019 @04:40AM (#20144921)
If you're building Apple projects, it might be hard or impossible to offload that to other operating system.
Re:Apple Is Listening by Alupis on Monday June 10, 2019 @10:58AM (#20147315)
GP said they were using a Xeon workstation, so I assumed it's not an Apple offering already.
Re:Apple Is Listening by ktta on Monday June 10, 2019 @11:27AM (#20147576)
iMac Pro has a 18-core Xeon W option.
Re:Apple Is Listening by Alupis on Monday June 10, 2019 @11:53AM (#20147875)
I guess I meant, usually people with Mac systems call them a Mac of some sort, not just a generic "Workstation".
Re:Apple Is Listening by nathana on Monday June 10, 2019 @06:05AM (#20145272)
If you're targeting Apple platforms with your builds, just how does a Threadripper workstation address the problem? (And don't say Hackintosh...)
Re:Apple Is Listening by viraptor on Monday June 10, 2019 @08:45AM (#20146197)
https://github.com/tpoechtrager/osxcross/

It may not be a viable solution for every project, but it does work for many.