News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Analysis of whether IMDB ratings suffer recency bias by thegabriele on Saturday June 08, 2019 @03:58AM (#20131209)
" Higher demands give higher quality "

I would suggest an higher standard deviation on quality, meaning that you could reach very top notch standards (your point) meanwhile mass producing total flat works as in music and i presume, all of the arts (my view).

Re:Analysis of whether IMDB ratings suffer recency bias by EugeneOZ on Saturday June 08, 2019 @04:24AM (#20131290)
Lol, compare modern music with trash we had in 80s, 90s. Even nowadays' pop trash sounds significantly better than old hits made on synthesizers. Everything evolves, as I said. Maybe you just forgot low-quality movies of previous years, but they did exist, tones of them.

We only want to remember good things.

Re:Analysis of whether IMDB ratings suffer recency bias by thegabriele on Saturday June 08, 2019 @06:01AM (#20131612)
There were no meaning to mass produce and diffuse music in those decades like there are today. I'm not saying 80s and 90s music was perfect (why pick those decades?), i say the more the demand the more the money the more the highs and the lows.

The "quality" you're referring to, i don't know: you're talking about what features of a sound...fidelity, loudness, dynamic?

Anyway, truly the 80s were the years of trash music...but trash as in metal though.

Re:Analysis of whether IMDB ratings suffer recency bias by EugeneOZ on Saturday June 08, 2019 @06:57AM (#20131760)
Loudness, of course, man. What else is the measure of quality? Loudness, without any doubts. Of course I talk about loudness.