I'm not sure I understand; if you had a basic passive portfolio during the 2008 financial crisis, you did pretty well for yourself: crashing rates meant that your bond-heavy portfolio increased in value. On top of that, rebalancing the longer-term portion of your allocation into stocks at the nadir means you got a ground floor ticket to a historically good bull market. All of this is with the most conservative, mechanical, low-touch investing strategy possible.
I might be misunderstanding something about the above, but failing that: what is your actual concern about another 2008-crisis-like event?
Yup, that's pretty much it. Unfortunately many people don't have the stomach for the market and end up selling at the worst possible time trying to avoid additional losses.
After all, if everyone was totally rational and held through downturns then market crashes would largely be eliminated.
It's great that your prime savings years have coincided with an exceptional run-up. I also have been fortunate. The difference seems to be that I don't look down my nose people who lacked perfect flexibility wrt when to enter or leave the market. I have reasons to believe I've been pretty smart about my savings and investments, but I still admit the role that pure luck has played.