To follow up with your first point, there's been some analysis suggesting that financial markets today are more efficient than they were in the 20th century, which means that price discovery happens more quickly. Historically, the markets returned 8-10% for people invested in indices. I've heard that the market returns today are closer to 3-4%, so even with FIRE you'd realistically need to budget for 1-2% to accommodate for market fluctuations.
I'm not sure that the cited figure of 3-4% return today is truly representative of recent years.
For example, for the popular pick VTSAX (Vanguard's Total Stock Market Index Fund), if you look at the average total return % for recent windows of time:
- YTD: 16.23%
- 1-Year: 4.43%
- 3-Year: 13.28%
- 5-Year: 9.97%
- 10-Year: 14.15%
- 15-Year: 8.91%
The 1-year number is just skewed by the late 2018 market correction in the short term.
Source: https://www.morningstar.com/funds/xnas/vtsax/betaquote.html
Although on the flip side, the number also assumes you have no flexibility and don't change your spending according to how much you have left.
It's a tricky one to work out, and 4% is (as you say) definitely not a number you can easily use for retiring in your 30s.
Re:Dad, Are We Rich?
by Mvandenbergh on Saturday June 08, 2019 @08:27AM
(#20132024)
Definitely. If you're willing to constrain consumption when required and work again if you have to, things change. Especially if you continue to work just enough in your professional field during early retirement that you can go back to earning an appreciable fraction of your previous earnings on a temporary basis if/when required.
1) We may be in a low-yield world for a long time.
2) Those studies were based on earlier retirement, not on people leaving the workforce in their 20s and 30s, the way that some very lucky HN readers may do.