“Apps intended for kids may not include third-party advertising or analytics”

Re:“Apps intended for kids may not include third-party adver... by edmundsauto on Thursday June 06, 2019 @12:00AM (#20111470)

These are valid counter-arguments; my intention wasn't to litigate the merits of each claim, just to mention that as the parent had trouble conceiving of other options than 1.

I will say, however, that your claims would be challenging to verify or refute -- quantity of contributions may not be a good metric, and it appears your Gmail/Win7 comparison is based on a single dimension (user power) which is further limited to one dimension of that dimension (whether it requires a constant connection).

You may be correct, but your comment didn't provide much of an argument to get me to think more of the problem. It just seemed like you needed to negate my (also unsubstantiated but admittedly devil's advocate position) out of some sense of anti-google sentiment.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:“Apps intended for kids may not include third-party adver... by krageon on Thursday June 06, 2019 @07:03AM (#20113315)

I think you really had a good piece of feedback going until you made it personal in the last paragraph. It does not endear you to the reader and from an intellectual perspective I don't understand why you'd finish an otherwise well-structured response like that. If it was out of anger, I would expect it in the front. Can you explain what made you write it like this?

[ Parent | on HN ]