Outcry as Australian police search public broadcaster

Re:Outcry as Australian police search public broadcaster by r3bl on Wednesday June 05, 2019 @12:44PM (#20106283)

"I came up with this strawman that people close to the situation didn't think of (probably because it isn't even close to being true), so I'm going to hold on my own strawman argument even though I have absolutely nothing to base it on."

There, fixed that for you.

Could it be that you're misinterpreting facts? No, it must be that those who have access to first- and second-hand accounts that are wrong. Not you, a person pulling out a hypothesis based off of less info nor any contact with any of the parties in the story.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Outcry as Australian police search public broadcaster by chrisseaton on Wednesday June 05, 2019 @12:50PM (#20106365)

You’re just being snide and snarky now.

I don’t know why people think it’s extreme to say that I don’t want my public broadcaster quoting their own opinions in the news reports. The article would have been complete without a quote from themselves, or could have used a quote from someone else qualified. Really easy solutions.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Outcry as Australian police search public broadcaster by r3bl on Wednesday June 05, 2019 @12:52PM (#20106386)

There's no such thing as unbiased journalism.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Outcry as Australian police search public broadcaster by chrisseaton on Wednesday June 05, 2019 @12:56PM (#20106434)

I agree - but people can try. Like not quoting yourself.

[ Parent | on HN ]