Re:Why aren’t more companies remote-first?
by esoterica on Wednesday June 05, 2019 @01:08PM
(#20106594)
The remote companies tend not to pay as well as some of the SF and valley firms. It costs less to beat the remote firms than to beat the local competition in the Bay Area.
Re:Why aren’t more companies remote-first?
by jaggederest on Wednesday June 05, 2019 @01:26PM
(#20106838)
Yes, but if you're living in e.g. Laredo TX, that floor is a TON higher than the "adjusted cost of living difference" between SF and Laredo.
It's much closer to a 20-30% discount on SF than the 70% difference a raw cost of living comparison would conclude. ( https://www.bestplaces.net/cost-of-living/san-francisco-ca/l... )
So in cheap areas you have to pay globally competitive, and in expensive areas you have to beat the locals.
Thus, it never makes sense to reduce pay for someone moving. Your goal should be to keep salaries above that floor, not pay as little as possible.