Re:Outcry as Australian police search public broadcaster
by pjc50 on Wednesday June 05, 2019 @12:17PM
(#20105906)
The point was not the method of destruction but that they were forced to do it at all, on a questionable legal basis, on computers they were still using (not disposing of).
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Outcry as Australian police search public broadcaster
by Fnoord on Wednesday June 05, 2019 @02:12PM
(#20107432)
> but that they were forced to do it at all
I'd like to underline this. The Guardian co-workers were forced to perform the entire deletion _themselves_ (!!!)
It is almost like a combination of some kind of forced, unpaid employment (akin to "slavery"), shifting the blame ("you did it yourself"), or retribution ("you abused it, you take care of it"). Very twisted.
Re:Outcry as Australian police search public broadcaster
by heraclius on Wednesday June 05, 2019 @04:31PM
(#20108813)
> The book, published next week, describes how the Guardian took the decision to destroy its own Macbooks after the government explicitly threatened the paper with an injunction.
They were “forced” but not in that sense. The Graun offered to do this instead, and so GCHQ came along to watch. There is a problem but not with forced labour.