Re:Proposal: A built-in Go error check function, try
by uryga on Wednesday June 05, 2019 @10:13AM
(#20104539)
it uses the same syntax as functions, but it doesn't behave like a function – functions generally can't manipulate control flow like that. so calling it a function is weird because it's closer to a language construct like `await`
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Proposal: A built-in Go error check function, try
by ngrilly on Wednesday June 05, 2019 @10:47AM
(#20104934)
We already have one built-in function that alters the control flow: panic. But I agree it's a bit weird.
Re:Proposal: A built-in Go error check function, try
by uryga on Wednesday June 05, 2019 @06:32PM
(#20109805)
tbh i don't know Go too well. as i understand it, `panic` can indeed hijack the control flow, i.e. stop it. but any function¹ can do that: just do `while 1 {}`! control flow won't return to the caller either way. so it's not that weird after all
Ruby blocks can do non-local control flow, i.e. return from their surrounding function, but that's what makes them distinct from functions.
---
¹ in a turing-complete language
(i'm a Haskell enthusiast, so please excuse the nitpicking :)