News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on How I Made $200k When I Was 16 Years Old Through Coding (2018). Parent comment

Re:How I Made $200k When I Was 16 Years Old Through Coding (... by smueller1234 on Wednesday June 05, 2019 @02:30AM (#20101977)
That's not true. My physicist friends from university ended up in various different places. Many of them with a technical or analytical twist, yes, but certainly not all in the 'tech industry': several data scientist, a quant, various opportunities at insurance companies, one who builds spy satellites, somebody who builds lensing systems for lithography, and of course a few who became software/system engineers. None of my acquaintances from uni struggled to find good employment in various industries.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:How I Made $200k When I Was 16 Years Old Through Coding (... by antisemiotic on Wednesday June 05, 2019 @02:55AM (#20102092)
I'm not sure if I understand what you mean, other than quants and insurance companies I'd consider all of these "tech jobs". Or does "tech" now mean "webdev"?
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:How I Made $200k When I Was 16 Years Old Through Coding (... by thaumasiotes on Wednesday June 05, 2019 @03:34AM (#20102250)
I would have thought that in this context "tech" meant "software".
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:How I Made $200k When I Was 16 Years Old Through Coding (... by antisemiotic on Wednesday June 05, 2019 @04:22AM (#20102447)
Eh, I don't live in the US and I'm not up to date on the slang, but honestly a sentence like "some people work in technology while others design equipment for IC manufacturing" sounds quite silly to me. I'll try to remember now.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:How I Made $200k When I Was 16 Years Old Through Coding (... by smueller1234 on Wednesday June 05, 2019 @12:33PM (#20106125)
Apologies for being obtuse. It was me, not you, that failed at communication. :)

The type of work, though, and skills required are quite different, regardless of that they technically both develop and involve 'technology'. Semiconductor lithography requires a pretty exciting mix of skills starting with plain physics (classical and by now a bit of quantum optics), materials science, mechanical engineering, data analysis/science, software engineering (both for simulation and analysis of production of lensing systems), and I'm sure I'm missing half. It is quite different from "writes software for a software company", which is the framing I had interpreted from the comment I originally responded to.

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:How I Made $200k When I Was 16 Years Old Through Coding (... by grosswait on Wednesday June 05, 2019 @10:44AM (#20104904)
I don't think your interpretation is wrong, just the context of a HN thread makes it more likely "tech" is software related.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:How I Made $200k When I Was 16 Years Old Through Coding (... by smueller1234 on Wednesday June 05, 2019 @12:24PM (#20106013)
That's the gross oversimplification I went for, indeed!
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:How I Made $200k When I Was 16 Years Old Through Coding (... by smueller1234 on Wednesday June 05, 2019 @12:27PM (#20106040)
Building spy satellites could be argued to be electrical engineering, space/flight engineering, physics, data science, etc. In the interpretation of tech industry == software, these are career options that are open to physicists (and similar grads) that aren't in the-HN-type-of-tech.
[ Parent | on HN ]