Re:Academics and students should take blogging and social me...
by FlagsAreFun on Tuesday June 04, 2019 @11:43PM
(#20101279)
I have worked in the academic sector and been exposed to it for a number of additional years. Reading and disseminating research, and more importantly citations, are a key intrinsic metric for researchers, and a KPI providing extrinsic motivation from administration and research funding bodies.
Research impact is a huge force in the academic world these days, and research can only have impact if read, understood and scrutinised by other researchers - as well as the public.
Re:Academics and students should take blogging and social me...
by gubbrora on Wednesday June 05, 2019 @12:08AM
(#20101402)
My internal monologue when reading this:
Imagine if people got funding based on Twitter engagement - what a disaster.
Why?
Well people buy Twitter engagement from bots.
And they don't buy citations?
Oh nooo, I can see that become a trend too. We are doomed!
Re:Academics and students should take blogging and social me...
by bscphil on Wednesday June 05, 2019 @02:47AM
(#20102061)
I agree strongly. While it's arguably true that to survive in the tough job environment for academics these days, you have to promote yourself, I would say that this inclination towards self-marketing is harmful to the academic community as a whole and does lasting damage to science and the humanities as institutions.
There are several motivations to write and publish, and being read (by the widest possible audience) is only one of them. Even if we put the most mundane reasons (publish or perish, publish to make money) aside, there is at least writing (and publishing) for the purely selfish reason of recording your ideas and, by doing so, making them more permanent and more real, as it were. I remember, during my academically active years, I never cared in the slightest whether anyone was going to read my papers or my book. If anyone was interested in my subject and were curious enough to discover them, they were most welcome to them; but it was entirely immaterial to me whether anyone actually did. This doesn’t mean I didn’t put any effort into writing those texts; quite the contrary. But writing them was a goal in itself; it was never a means to anything for which it would require wide audience.
I can’t imagine this attitude is unique.