Re:FBI alleges that DC Solar Scammed Berkshire Hathaway for ...
by philipkglass on Tuesday June 04, 2019 @06:38PM
(#20099943)
OP said "by burning a tonne of carbon" rather than "by emitting a tonne of CO2," which is the main reason your calculated per-gallon results are significantly higher than mine. Neither interpretation gets close to $6/gallon in added taxes, so I'm not quite sure what OP meant.
300$/ton * 8.65kg = 2.6$ per gallon (0.6$ per liter)
100$/ton * 8.65kg = 0.87$ (0.23$ per liter)
30$/ton * 8.65kg = 0.26$ (0.07$ per liter)
7 cent per liter seems quite acceptable. And people are reporting that some companies are targeting that price point for sequestration. Please correct my if I miscalculated something.