News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:GM and Fiat Chrysler Unmasked as Tesla’s Source of Cash by lmm on Tuesday June 04, 2019 @11:31AM (#20095944)
> It isn't $10000 off the default option, it's $10000 off the better for society option to bring it more in line with the default option.

Again you're assuming the default option is buying a car. Society shouldn't be paying people to buy cars, especially rich people: that's not a good thing to incentivise.

> We can talk about alternatives to car, that isn't where politics is at, and I'm not sure tax credits would be a particularly good tool for encouraging alternatives.

Surely if you believe tax credits work for electric cars then you should believe they would work for other things too.

> As I said don't let perfect be the enemy of good.

Is it even good though? It's hard to believe that paying rich people to buy cars (which still have negative externalities - land use, congestion, traffic deaths) is a better-than-replacement-level use of public funds.

Re:GM and Fiat Chrysler Unmasked as Tesla’s Source of Cash by benj111 on Tuesday June 04, 2019 @11:38AM (#20096006)
How narrowly do you you want me to word it, for better or worse buying a car is the default. I'm not saying I like it.

Bicycles are relatively cheaper, I suspect the barrier to cycling isn't cost. Its infrastructure, culture, etc.