Re:Steve Yegge: Singleton Considered Stupid
by DanielBMarkham on Tuesday May 27, 2008 @09:07AM
(#200930)
Not sure if I'm being helpful to you or not, but I'll reply again hoping I hit on something that you find useful.
I think the question is: at what point when designing from the bottom-up do you realize it was shorter to come at it from the top down? And at that point do you do a "52-pickup" and refactor, make the best of what you have, or continue working the way you were?
I used to do this, but haven't for a long time. I was really suprised when I got into this same mess a year or two ago writing a system that had multiple datasources and multiple valid object graphs.
Looking at this from the distance of a year or more, my mistake was in paradigms. I really should have went totally functional with the project instead of trying a classic OOP-tiering structure. Because my head was in the wrong place, I was like a guy with a square peg trying to get it into a round hole -- I just kept thinking I needed a bigger hammer.
Now I could have still kept an OO mentality and solved the problem -- no doubt about it. But that would have required more design up front than I gave it. So in this case lack of sufficient thinking up front combined with my head being in the wrong space caused the code base to be a lot more jumbled than it should have been.
I think the question is: at what point when designing from the bottom-up do you realize it was shorter to come at it from the top down? And at that point do you do a "52-pickup" and refactor, make the best of what you have, or continue working the way you were?
I used to do this, but haven't for a long time. I was really suprised when I got into this same mess a year or two ago writing a system that had multiple datasources and multiple valid object graphs.
Looking at this from the distance of a year or more, my mistake was in paradigms. I really should have went totally functional with the project instead of trying a classic OOP-tiering structure. Because my head was in the wrong place, I was like a guy with a square peg trying to get it into a round hole -- I just kept thinking I needed a bigger hammer.
Now I could have still kept an OO mentality and solved the problem -- no doubt about it. But that would have required more design up front than I gave it. So in this case lack of sufficient thinking up front combined with my head being in the wrong space caused the code base to be a lot more jumbled than it should have been.