Re:Random Forest vs. Neural Network
by pplonski86 on Monday June 03, 2019 @11:49AM
(#20084500)
I don't like such brute-force approach. Even if you have low cost of computing the number of possible combinations of hyperparameters is huge! Google Cloud AutoML Tables solution cost is 20 USD per 1 hour of computing (I guess that's because of inefficient Neural Architecture Search algorithm). Running few ML experiment can easily end with huge bill.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
For independent ML hobbyists, sure. But if you're a business which can get a positive ROI from it, it's well worth the time.
Re:Random Forest vs. Neural Network
by mochomocha on Monday June 03, 2019 @01:54PM
(#20086028)
It depends. Complexity creeps up easily in ML systems. A kitchen-sink of gazillions of algorithms (and code bases) in an ensemble creates a very brittle system I wouldn't want to deal with.