> A State has a violence on monopoly […]
A game of Monopoly will turn the most affable man violent (you probably meant the monopoly on violence).
Re:Seasteading
by roywiggins on Monday June 03, 2019 @11:03AM
(#20083839)
Everyone else might still ignore you. Nobody recognizes Abkhazia, even though it's kinda self-governing.
I've never heard of this State. It's very similar to Transnistria (which some of the world recognizes as a nation, but most UN countries still recognize as part of Moldova).
Kinda? Can you be kind enough to elaborate.
Re:Seasteading
by roywiggins on Monday June 03, 2019 @01:52PM
(#20086006)
Well, it's dependent on Russia to even exist. It's not like it has an independent foreign policy and depending who you ask, is not really self-governing at all:
https://www.newsweek.com/how-russias-fsb-colonized-abkhazia-...
If you could hire a private army, or maybe an army of pirates, Seasteading would work. But you have to pay them. Conquerors often paid armies by charging taxes to the lands they conquered, placing them in debt. The solders who were injured and missing arms/legs got their reward by collecting taxes and maintaining the taken land.
The book Debt: The First 5,000 Years, goes into this concept in great detail. Another book in this genre is The Dictators Handbook.