Re:Google’s Dominance Is No Longer a Sure Thing
by enitihas on Sunday June 02, 2019 @01:41PM
(#20076855)
I think all companies would want to "have a highly profitable slice of the market than dominate it", since it ensures higher profits and frees you from monopoly accusations, but only few have managed to work it in a good way (e.g, Apple). In most markets where Google succeeded, they ended up being dominant.
Re:Google’s Dominance Is No Longer a Sure Thing
by scarface74 on Sunday June 02, 2019 @02:07PM
(#20077016)
Apple didn’t do that by reducing cost. They have hundreds of physical retail stores where they hire people directly (not contractors). They did it by offering a product that people were willing to pay a premium for.
Re:Google’s Dominance Is No Longer a Sure Thing
by scarface74 on Sunday June 02, 2019 @02:05PM
(#20077001)
Does anyone think that GCP is successful by any metric compared to Azure and AWS?
Re:Google’s Dominance Is No Longer a Sure Thing
by cameronbrown on Sunday June 02, 2019 @03:32PM
(#20077510)
The real question is, does Google really need to dominate to be successful? We should be rating success by the quality of a product and market share is a relatively poor proxy for that.
Re:Google’s Dominance Is No Longer a Sure Thing
by scarface74 on Sunday June 02, 2019 @04:11PM
(#20077784)
The quality of the product especially for enterprise products has a lot to do with the quality of support. Google also lags there.
edit: in other words, I think Google would rather have a highly profitable slice of the market than dominate it and have all the gains eaten up by a greedy sales org.