Re:Amazon Taking Down Erotica, Removing From Kindles
by jonhendry on Thursday December 16, 2010 @03:29AM
(#2011476)
"That isn't a reason against incest per se. It is merely an objection to certain forms of incest - specifically, those that lead to children."
And, you know, child rape by a family member. Which is probably, by far, the most common form of incest.
Re:Amazon Taking Down Erotica, Removing From Kindles
by sliverstorm on Wednesday December 15, 2010 @05:39AM
(#2007662)
Though it does not thrill me to say so, you make a valid point.
It is worth noting though that cultural mores don't work well with shades of grey- they are best suited to black-and-whites. (i.e. do/don't instead of do this way/don't do that way)
Re:Amazon Taking Down Erotica, Removing From Kindles
by jules on Wednesday December 15, 2010 @09:21AM
(#2008159)
Do you really feel bad about a consenting man and woman having a relationship? (or man and man or woman and woman) I have trouble identifying with this feeling.
Re:Amazon Taking Down Erotica, Removing From Kindles
by sliverstorm on Wednesday December 15, 2010 @05:59PM
(#2010197)
You read too much into my words. What does not thrill me is realizing I was wrong.
With freely-available contraception and abortion, it's hard to think of any good reason for the absolute cultural taboo against all incest.
One of the goals of literature should be to challenge cultural taboos. Any good bookseller should realize it.