Re:Amazon Taking Down Erotica, Removing From Kindles
by m_eiman on Wednesday December 15, 2010 @05:40AM
(#2007664)
Going by that logic, to "effectively" ban the book while not "technically" banning it, the govt just needs to pursue the top few channels to stop carrying it. Book will be effectively unavailable and everyone's conscience will be clean.
Hey, that sounds familiar. Say, for example, that some organization releases a bunch of more or less secret stuff, and you want to prevent them from getting donations to continue releasing stuff, you could just lean a bit on VISA and Mastercard…
Re:Amazon Taking Down Erotica, Removing From Kindles
by javert on Wednesday December 15, 2010 @07:23AM
(#2007858)
> Going by that logic...
The government didn't tell Amazon to stop carrying the book, so your point is irrelevant.
> But you would...
Well I haven't really thought about that, because in reading the post, I was just distracted by the exaggeration that I pointed out in my original comment.
Going by that logic, to "effectively" ban the book while not "technically" banning it, the govt just needs to pursue the top few channels to stop carrying it. Book will be effectively unavailable and everyone's conscience will be clean.
> I wouldn't sell incest erotica either, and that doesn't mean I ban or censor books.
But you would make that clear to everyone before starting to do business with them, right? Or if you decided to change your stand one day (which is quite plausible since things do change with time), you would perhaps offer a better reason then "Because I can"?