A review of the Planck keyboard – 48 keys are plenty

Posted by callum-oakley on Sunday June 02, 2019 @07:16AM
from the callum-oakley.github.io dept.

https://callum-oakley.github.io/posts/48-keys-are-plenty.html

( 4 comments | 8 points | on HN )

Re:A review of the Planck keyboard – 48 keys are plenty by rijoja on Sunday June 02, 2019 @07:20AM (#20074788)

Just so it happens I am doing a compilation of lesser known input methods and would love to discuss this further with you. I believe that there are loads of opportunity to revisit keyboard input dogma! Chorded typists for example can write well over 200 wpm, as a matter of fact it is for some a requirement.

Really good article! Would love to discuss this further

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:A review of the Planck keyboard – 48 keys are plenty by evantravers on Monday June 03, 2019 @10:29PM (#20091230)

I put together a list of odd keyboard layouts if you want to ask any of the folks who volunteered for my post: http://evantravers.com/articles/2019/04/20/community-post-40...

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:A review of the Planck keyboard – 48 keys are plenty by rijoja on Wednesday June 12, 2019 @01:26PM (#20167070)

that would be lovely! How can I reach you?

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:A review of the Planck keyboard – 48 keys are plenty by callum-oakley on Sunday June 02, 2019 @07:57AM (#20074928)

Nice! I would be happy to answer any questions, and interested to see the results. And yeah I've always been tempted to try steno, but haven't put the time in to giving it a proper go yet. It looks to be a very steep learning curve.

[ Parent | on HN ]