Re:Tokyo proves that housing shortages are a political choice
by codedokode on Sunday June 02, 2019 @12:13AM
(#20073435)
> to finally architectural concerns because why would we want to impose on history of buildings barely a hundred years old.
On the other hand, why do people need to build a new, ugly modern high-rise buildings in historical parts of the city? Is there not enough of other land?
Historical parts better stay historical forever and there should be no new buildings, I think. Because no tourist will ever come to see modern, ugly concrete buildings.
Re:Tokyo proves that housing shortages are a political choice
by solidsnack9000 on Sunday June 02, 2019 @12:22AM
(#20073456)
There can't be that many historic buildings in a city that burned to the ground in 1906, yet somehow we have historic auto-body shops, historic bars, historic music halls converted to comedy clubs, historic crab restaurants...
Re:Tokyo proves that housing shortages are a political choice
by mactrey on Sunday June 02, 2019 @12:38AM
(#20073501)
https://i.redd.it/i3ndx7dhc5x21.jpg
Historic, historic, architecturally beautiful, indescribably beautiful San Francisco...
Re:Tokyo proves that housing shortages are a political choice
by meddlepal on Sunday June 02, 2019 @02:31AM
(#20073863)
Kind of a waste of such a nice street grid for such low density housing.
Re:Tokyo proves that housing shortages are a political choice
by rayiner on Sunday June 02, 2019 @08:43AM
(#20075109)
Waste of a lovely bayside location. Imagine how much better that water view would look contrasted against modern glass and steel skyscrapers: https://s3.amazonaws.com/si-interactive/prod/ai-cio-com/wp-c....
Re:Tokyo proves that housing shortages are a political choice
by solidsnack9000 on Sunday June 02, 2019 @02:31PM
(#20077134)
It could even be nice with two or three story buildings.
Re:Tokyo proves that housing shortages are a political choice
by tasubotadas on Sunday June 02, 2019 @08:47AM
(#20075127)
And then people wonder why the city isn't investing in public transport.
There have been many stories posted here and elsewhere how nearly every attempt to build housing is derailed, usually under the guise of setting aside for "affordable housing", followed by union workers only, followed by environmental concern; one was defeated for adding a few hours of shade to twenty percent of a play area/park of a school!; to finally architectural concerns because why would we want to impose on history of buildings barely a hundred years old. It comes down to money for politicians and those already there not wanting "those people" living among them.
Heck in my local metro area they have squads to clear out the homeless and undesirables every time a convention or big game comes in; a town which has been blue for most all this century and most of the previous. One where you will hear the politicians stamp their feet about how unfair it is and if only they had more power and money they could fix it, yet they never have. Instead a new stadium displaced an older black church, go figure.