News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Lisp System Implementation by Annatar on Saturday June 01, 2019 @10:29AM (#20069360)
"So much so that you might as well emit machine code instead."

Exactly, thank you!!! So why the hell would you screw around with bytecode!?!?!

I don't want portability, my source code is portability! I want the fastest possible machine code translation for the smallest possible program!!! That "portability" thing with bytecode makes me absolutely livid!!!

Re:Lisp System Implementation by avmich on Saturday June 01, 2019 @12:22PM (#20069911)
Remember, neither translation to machine code is guaranteed to be faster than translation to a VM bytecode, nor execution of such a code is guaranteed to be faster than execution of bytecode.
Re:Lisp System Implementation by Annatar on Sunday June 02, 2019 @05:06AM (#20074341)
The machine code has to be faster because the intermediate to machine code step, which impacts performance at least once is eliminated.