Re:Allegations of FBI crypto backdoors in OpenBSD IPSEC
by there on Tuesday December 14, 2010 @09:00PM
(#2006694)
to feed your paranoia:
Re:Allegations of FBI crypto backdoors in OpenBSD IPSEC
by smallblacksun on Tuesday December 14, 2010 @11:11PM
(#2007024)
>We have never allowed US citizens or foreign citizens working in the US
to hack on crypto code
This is hilarious logic, because no other country could possibly want to have a backdoor, and the NSA/CIA couldn't possibly hire a foreign national working in another country.
Re:Allegations of FBI crypto backdoors in OpenBSD IPSEC
by Malus on Wednesday December 15, 2010 @12:12AM
(#2007144)
It has nothing to do with that. The rationale for this is to avoid any problems with US law regarding the exporting of cryptographic software:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Export_of_cryptography_in_the_U...
Re:Allegations of FBI crypto backdoors in OpenBSD IPSEC
by burgerbrain on Wednesday December 15, 2010 @12:17AM
(#2007155)
It has to do with the laws the US places on exporting crypto.
Re:Allegations of FBI crypto backdoors in OpenBSD IPSEC
by wlangstroth on Tuesday December 14, 2010 @09:48PM
(#2006827)
Paranoia? I wasn't looking for a smoking gun, I was looking for an illustration of business as usual.
Re:Allegations of FBI crypto backdoors in OpenBSD IPSEC
by Herring on Tuesday December 14, 2010 @08:58PM
(#2006689)
I get the impression crypto is very hard to implement right, which would mean it's very hard to evaluate.
Re:Allegations of FBI crypto backdoors in OpenBSD IPSEC
by wlangstroth on Wednesday December 15, 2010 @08:06AM
(#2007936)
"Hard" is just an opportunity to learn something. Are you saying you're not a hacker?
Anyone familiar with the code in question? Even the neighbourhood would be helpful.
http://www.openbsd.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/src/