News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Allegations of FBI crypto backdoors in OpenBSD IPSEC by tptacek on Tuesday December 14, 2010 @06:41PM (#2006248)
Pretty sure the NSA is content to sit back and watch people inadvertantly add the backdoors for them.
Re:Allegations of FBI crypto backdoors in OpenBSD IPSEC by cperciva on Tuesday December 14, 2010 @06:45PM (#2006267)
They do that too, of course. But I have trouble believing that they always stop there. Look at their idiotic trojan PRNG, for instance (and if you believe their "What? That curve was chosen completely randomly! Of course we didn't construct it specially!" story, I have a bridge to sell you.)
Re:Allegations of FBI crypto backdoors in OpenBSD IPSEC by jberryman on Tuesday December 14, 2010 @06:56PM (#2006312)
Re:Allegations of FBI crypto backdoors in OpenBSD IPSEC by tptacek on Tuesday December 14, 2010 @07:03PM (#2006342)
You wonder whether it was some kind of crazy NSA intern project.
Re:Allegations of FBI crypto backdoors in OpenBSD IPSEC by 16s on Tuesday December 14, 2010 @07:53PM (#2006510)
They prefer researching backdoors. The FBI implements them. Big difference. NSA researched and designed the clipper chips, then the FBI tried to get everyone to use the phones.
Re:Allegations of FBI crypto backdoors in OpenBSD IPSEC by tptacek on Tuesday December 14, 2010 @07:55PM (#2006520)
If by "implementing" you mean "sending an actual person over to plug in the recording device", yes. If by "implementing" you mean "contracting somebody to insert a cryptographic side channel in an operating system", then, very no.
Re:Allegations of FBI crypto backdoors in OpenBSD IPSEC by trotsky on Tuesday December 14, 2010 @08:42PM (#2006645)
which government agency is traditionally in charge of backdooring security systems?
Re:Allegations of FBI crypto backdoors in OpenBSD IPSEC by tptacek on Tuesday December 14, 2010 @08:45PM (#2006650)
FBI if it's like, a keylogger. NSA otherwise.