News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Reputation: kind of a big deal by thesz on Tuesday December 14, 2010 @01:07PM (#2005050)
>If you take an action — write a blog post, publish a photo, launch a website — you want your action to spread to as many people as possible.

Overgeneralization, is what I see there.

Actually, "avoiding success at all costs" motto is great.

I think that quote from Adam Chlipala (author or Ur and Ur/Web) is quite appropriate:

"I also want to emphasize that I'm not trying to maximize adoption of Ur/Web. Rather, I'm trying to maximize the effectiveness of people who do choose to use it. This means that I'm completely happy if basic features of Ur/Web mean that 90% of programmers will never be able to use it."

http://www.impredicative.com/pipermail/ur/2010-December/0003...

I think that author is wrong.

You don't have to have superfans.

Re:Reputation: kind of a big deal by holman on Tuesday December 14, 2010 @01:59PM (#2005257)
I'm not saying you have to have superfans; you're welcome to do whatever you'd like (and there are plenty of paths to success!) I just think there's so many examples of a small, passionate userbase forming the bedrock of success. Why not try to foster that?
Re:Reputation: kind of a big deal by arbales on Friday December 17, 2010 @06:23AM (#2015899)
My totally uninformed assessment of human nature is that you probably _do_ want your action to spread to as many people as possible, regardless of their response to it. The success of public networks like Twitter demonstrate that.