Re:The Art of Thinking Long-Term Even When Money Is Running Out
by mieseratte on Thursday May 30, 2019 @06:43AM
(#20049884)
> I don't know that a 3-month temporary offer is really necessary. In California at least, where employment is "at-will",
Yeah, in an at-will state you might as well consider the "trial" period to be in place no matter what. If things don't work out well they'll just toss your ass to the curb. Maybe if you're lucky like me your boss will have a soul and give you some amount of severance at least.
Re:The Art of Thinking Long-Term Even When Money Is Running Out
by duxup on Thursday May 30, 2019 @10:26AM
(#20051435)
When I took my first job I just assumed that it was a sort of trial.
Two people were hired. Me and another dude.
The other dude was invited to look elsewhere (they let him stay and work while he looked for a job so that was very nice), and I got a series of raises after they clearly were comfortable with me. They then started looking for a replacement for the other dude.
Effectively I assumed (correctly) I was on a sort of "trial" anyway.
It's rare to fire new employees in their first few months, but it does happen. Similarly I have seen people join a company, and leave after their first week because a better job offer came in. It sucks when it happens... but overall I'd say the system works pretty well.