News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on PG on Java - comments from 2001. Parent comment

Re:PG on Java - comments from 2001 by redthrowaway on Tuesday December 14, 2010 @12:16PM (#2004848)
Only compared to something like Python. It's slightly more verbose than C++, but not overly longer, on a LOC basis.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:PG on Java - comments from 2001 by steveklabnik on Tuesday December 14, 2010 @12:23PM (#2004885)
Maybe on a purely syntactical level, but culturally, Java seems to embrace verbosity.

You don't see C++ programmers making thousand-line XML-based build files, or creating FactorySingletonFactoryVisitors.

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:PG on Java - comments from 2001 by haploid on Tuesday December 14, 2010 @12:47PM (#2004970)
Actually, yes you do. The original GoF was written with C++ in mind. Plenty of enterprise C++ code embraces heavy use of design patterns.
[ Parent | on HN ]