[1] https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/BF01965761
This isn't a question of "evolutionary psychology", but of neuroscience.
- psilocybin has been proven to reduce vision capabilities under all circumstances, and this is conclusively proven in that report?
- each of his contributing sub-theories must have been true (all are pre-requisites) for his overall theory to have some unrealized truth to it?
- there are conclusive studies demonstrating it is not possible for psilocybin to effect evolutionary psychology?
Just trying to get a clear understanding of what you are saying, and what you are not. Typing is such a low-bandwidth medium.
EDIT: -1, gosh I find it frustrating how difficult it seems to be to communicate with others on certain topics.
So, what you're saying is that it's state-of-the-art work in the burgeoning field of evolutionary psychology.