Here is a good starting point for the LHC: https://www.quora.com/Could-any-practical-benefits-of-the-La...

And here's a good starting point for the Apollo moon missions: https://www.nasa.gov/sites/default/files/80660main_ApolloFS....

Quite a few things, to name a few:

* improved firefighting protective gear

* Athletic shoes

* Sports stadiums being able to move the field of play

* seismological monitors for everything from trains to trucks

* base defibrillator tech

* cordless power tools

* skin care: "Estee Lauder uses digital image analyzers and software based on NASA lunar research to evaluate cosmetic products."

[0] https://www.nasa.gov/sites/default/files/80660main_ApolloFS....

Putting a dude on the Moon seems like a roundabout way to get better skin cream and footwear.

And if that had been the only benefit then of course the whole program would be questionable. You asked for examples for the moon program and LHC, and you were given them in ample supply. If they aren't satisfactory in budging your opinion, this flow of discourse puts the burden on you to say something intelligent, and cherry picking only a single, and perhaps least relevant example doesn't really accomplish that.

There's no lack of material demonstrating that NASA's accomplishments contribute more to the economy than they drain in tax dollars [0] and it's difficult to ignore the volume & leaps of technical advancements achieved by earlier missions. You clearly have a different view though, so perhaps sharing that in a constructive way would be more beneficial than posting shallow comments that obviously ignore the information you requested.

[0]https://www.thebalance.com/nasa-budget-current-funding-and-h...