News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:DIY facial recognition for porn sparks concern by JohnFen on Wednesday May 29, 2019 @06:05PM (#20046071)
> Acceptable behavior won't need to be hidden

There is plenty of acceptable behavior that people, quite reasonably, don't want to be tracked or widely known.

> The particular problem the author mentioned was marriage.

I understand. I was speaking to a larger point, not about this problem in particular.

Re:DIY facial recognition for porn sparks concern by lopmotr on Wednesday May 29, 2019 @09:49PM (#20047620)
There are useful secrets like business secrets or planning a surprise party. But you have to carefully protect them anyway. What other behaviors are you thinking of that should be protected against easy searching but which are still publicly visible?
Re:DIY facial recognition for porn sparks concern by JohnFen on Thursday May 30, 2019 @11:53AM (#20052441)
> What other behaviors are you thinking of that should be protected against easy searching but which are still publicly visible?

Things like my physical location, what I'm buying at the store, what medications I'm using, and so forth. Honestly, the list is extremely long.

Re:DIY facial recognition for porn sparks concern by cardiffspaceman on Wednesday May 29, 2019 @11:23PM (#20048081)
If you're organizing a lawful protest and in the process, traveling from place to place, how do you avoid triggering a disruption of your protest?
Re:DIY facial recognition for porn sparks concern by tsarech on Thursday May 30, 2019 @03:29AM (#20049107)
Given that a protest by its very nature is a disruptive event, i consider this fair game. Otherwise you're trying to silence dissenting opinion by outmanuvering, and how is it NOT totalitarian to silence dissent?
Re:DIY facial recognition for porn sparks concern by JohnFen on Friday May 31, 2019 @04:22PM (#20064610)
I think that it's a rather large stretch to call wanting to avoid disruptions in a passive way like that "silencing dissent".