Re:Whitepixel v2 now brute forcing 33.1 billion password/sec
by mrb on Tuesday December 14, 2010 @09:27AM
(#2004227)
EC2 is NOT cost-effective at all for hash computations as I describe in detail in:
(This is the machine I built to develop whitepixel).
Re:Whitepixel v2 now brute forcing 33.1 billion password/sec
by dedward on Tuesday December 14, 2010 @10:37AM
(#2004471)
I'm not a bitcoins expert - but wouldn't any jump in the availability of bitcoins necessarily cause deflation, as with any currency?
If someone finds a way to generate,say, 5x more bitcoins that what the average expected amount is - they have a temporary advantage, but once those coins hit the market, the market is diluted and will quickly catch up.
Bitcoins has replaced mining gold with generating bitcoins - so it will be harnessing server infrastructure and good code / math -vs- digging big holes in the ground.
Re:Whitepixel v2 now brute forcing 33.1 billion password/sec
by Zaak on Tuesday December 14, 2010 @11:50AM
(#2004736)
That's true. Also, as more computing power is added to its network, the difficulty of the hashing problem is increased to maintain the bitcoin creation rate at about 50 per ten minutes.
Re:Whitepixel v2 now brute forcing 33.1 billion password/sec
by Tichy on Tuesday December 14, 2010 @02:00PM
(#2005268)
They say there is a limited amount of BitCoins, though - I think 21 million?
Maybe this is the final incentive for me to look into EC2...