Re:Google’s Chrome Becomes Web ‘Gatekeeper’ and Rivals Complain
by tenpaiyomi on Wednesday May 29, 2019 @05:17AM
(#20038159)
That's not a dark pattern though. Potentially poor behavior, sure, but dark pattern, no.
Re:Google’s Chrome Becomes Web ‘Gatekeeper’ and Rivals Complain
by afandian on Wednesday May 29, 2019 @05:30AM
(#20038233)
"Complete your antivirus" has a pre-checked tickbox for a totally irrelevant product. And in the process agreeing to a license. That's pretty dark.
Maybe as someone with above-average technical ability this looks obvious to you. To a lot of people, it isn't. And this pattern is aimed at fooling the less technically literate.
Re:Google’s Chrome Becomes Web ‘Gatekeeper’ and Rivals Complain
by xxs on Wednesday May 29, 2019 @10:33AM
(#20040654)
Agreeing to a license in the EU requires an affirmative action (i.e. pre-ticked checkboxes are automatically a fail to comply)
The requirements to have unticked checkboxes predates GDPR.
Re:Google’s Chrome Becomes Web ‘Gatekeeper’ and Rivals Complain
by legacynl on Wednesday May 29, 2019 @05:33AM
(#20038253)
yes it is, dark patterns refer to user-design decissions that arguably exploit human-weaknesses. In this case human-attention span (not noticing that you have to disable this option), lazyness(it costs effor to opt-out) and human confidence in authority (I trust avast with my AV, so I trust avast not to exploit my trust (but they do)).
Re:Google’s Chrome Becomes Web ‘Gatekeeper’ and Rivals Complain
by propertymagnate on Wednesday May 29, 2019 @05:31AM
(#20038245)
It's example number two on the wikipedia page for dark patterns, Misdirection.
And advertising something on your own property sure sounds reasonable, but I think it's a slightly different story when "your own property" is "the de facto homepage of the internet". That's what I meant by "abusing monopoly position".