Re:Advertising as a source of dissatisfaction: cross-nationa...
by tim333 on Tuesday May 28, 2019 @06:41PM
(#20035121)
People would still spend money and companies still grow even if you banned advertising. I still quite like having housing, good food, travel and so on even if I haven't seen adverts for those recently.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Advertising as a source of dissatisfaction: cross-nationa...
by crispinb on Tuesday May 28, 2019 @08:38PM
(#20035842)
Marketers have always been clear that their task is to manufacture desire. Beyond the basics of food, sex, basic security, etc, wants are cultural constructions. Of course you want what you want. You did not make yourself. Your culture has that job.
If we had had a century of relentless propaganda installing onto young brains stereotypes of the glories of a clear night sky, or clean healthy rivers (instead of trivial comforts & consumer gewgaws), do you think people would still 'want' the things that destroy our natural rights to experience those things quite as much as they do?
Re:Advertising as a source of dissatisfaction: cross-nationa...
by Mirioron on Wednesday May 29, 2019 @12:24AM
(#20036842)
Yes, because most of the things we want we want because of biological desire. Clean rivers and clear skies are nice for a brief moment, but they can't compete with the dopamine release of sugar and sex.