News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Google revives controversial cold-fusion experiments by mikeash on Tuesday May 28, 2019 @05:43PM (#20034708)
I think they’re saying that a single fusion event produces 3-4x more energy than a single fission event.
Re:Google revives controversial cold-fusion experiments by grkvlt on Wednesday May 29, 2019 @12:39PM (#20042340)
But even that is pretty vague, since a single Uranium atom fission event releases about 200 MeV of energy, whereas most of the Hydrogen/Deuterium/Tritium/Helium/etc. fusion pathways release around 10% of this per fusion event: D + T -> He fusion gives 17 MeV, 4 p -> He gives 27 MeV, D + D -> He is 12 MeV and so on. Now, the energy released per nucleon greater for fusion, but I'm not convinced that's a useful or intuitive metric?
Re:Google revives controversial cold-fusion experiments by mikeash on Wednesday May 29, 2019 @01:23PM (#20042871)
How about energy per kilogram?
Re:Google revives controversial cold-fusion experiments by grkvlt on Wednesday June 05, 2019 @10:13PM (#20110954)
OK, so 235 kg of U_235 has the same number of fissile units (N atoms = 1000 x N_a) as 5 kg of D-T has of fusible units (2N atoms of combined weight 5 amu, or 1000 x N_a pairs) so (ignoring the N_a for now) one kg of U_235 gives 200 MeV / 235 = 0.85 MeV and the D-T fusion gives 17 MeV / 5 = 3.40 MeV

So, yeah, that's exactly four times the energy per kilogram. Now, why couldn't they just say THAT on the web page instead of the confusing and meaningless "this energy is 3-4 times more powerful than that energy" nonsense? But, thanks 'mikeash for clearing that up for me!

Re:Google revives controversial cold-fusion experiments by wutbrodo on Tuesday May 28, 2019 @06:14PM (#20034944)
Do you mean a single _fusion_ event?
Re:Google revives controversial cold-fusion experiments by mikeash on Tuesday May 28, 2019 @07:24PM (#20035422)
Yes, thanks. Brain no function beer well without.