Re:Advertising as a source of dissatisfaction: cross-nationa...
by Nasrudith on Tuesday May 28, 2019 @06:15PM
(#20034946)
Status can't be all of luxury goods - although it may be for say fashion. Material comforts and perception of superiority are reasons - those who have a community and any disposible income have their own market "profiles" based on familarity. Even if it is just say preferred sorts of Whiskey by mennonites.
Re:Advertising as a source of dissatisfaction: cross-nationa...
by TheOtherHobbes on Tuesday May 28, 2019 @07:26PM
(#20035440)
In a capitalist society status is defined entirely by ownership of capital, and low status is defined by very limited capital.
So of course luxury goods are defined primarily by their capital cost, supported by subsidiary markers like cultural capital and social proof. Actual utility (and quality) come second.
Competitive status display is entirely about the careful curation of success tokens - clothes (+ accessories), car, house, sexual and breeding partner(s), and the amount of autonomy, agency, and political and cultural capital at work.
Ads exist to promote competitive status display through curated consumption of success tokens.
It's a sport no one can ever win, but for some people it's enough to be on the leaderboard for a while.
This (2+ hours) documentary about status is quite eye opening: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=t1MqJPHxy6g